THE WAR OF THE COALITION AGAINST KADHAFI CONDUCTED BY SARKOZY: Beyond the misleading appearances, the implacable realities

of Other Media | Saturday, March 26, 2011
In normal times, no democrat would moods to see outside powers intervene to restore law and the law in Libya enable the emergence of a democracy that restores the people's sovereign right to build power. Moreover, if many of our leaders and African officials have tried to sell the idea of ​​humanitarian intervention or Democratic, at the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall, it was in the context of promoting a newinternational community more united and evolves into a larger concern for sharing the fruits of democracy at all. But we came back since. And what is happening in many African countries and particularly in North Africa, shows that the creeds of the great powers on human rights, democracy, are perverted by their desire for hegemony andaccession to the wealth of poor countries to finance their own dwindling savings. So here we are to doubt the merits of the great anger of Nicolas Sarkozy against Muammar Gaddafi and failing to bail the NATO or the European Union, has led to UN Resolution opening the door to an international war in Libya. Here we have many reasons to doubt the sincerity of proclamations. Nicolas Sarkozy is not a model democrat nor in his country or outside. Rather, it appears someone eager, some say even agitated, which runs the search for international dividends to halt a loss of credit internally but also to replenish the finances of his country. In the case of Libya, he struggles to convince the honest consciousness of the purity of his intentions when we remember that the court has unbridled Guide Libyan history of the backlog in this area compared to other Western capitals that have made the "pussies Naaba" (Editor's note: greeting the leader, beating the ground with his elbows) at Gaddafi for contracts, petrodollars and other benefits, to injure their elbows. The war against Qadhafi in which he is currently engaged to death would be enough to convince if they also felt concerned to allow Bahraini enjoy the same freedoms and if you saw him also at the forefront against the power Yemeni massacre in his arm round people screaming for help to his freedom. Do not talk about those African countries which are parodies of democracy, which shoots live bullets at people in revolt for truth and justice, without evoking the slightest emotion of French number one. So this war against Sarkozy's Libya is not a clean war, if ever they exist. It is much more motivated by thirst but also evoked by the personal injury of a man who has been insulted, he believes, by "subhuman". Indeed, the words used by children Gaddafi against him, threatening to disclose certain largesse made by them to finance his 2007 election campaign run its course with the tsunami effect that disclosure could result in electoral politics in 2012, could only touch the quick and the call to strike before being struck. If in addition, we consider the consequences of humiliation in Libya in other African countries, it is understood that the French president has been won by the St. Vitus dance and it took action. To satisfy his thirst for revenge, nothing but nothing will prevent the blade from falling. Neither the offer of cease-fire that Gaddafi will seek through the media of undermining nor the pacification of reconquered cities where there will be another way to denounce the commission of crimes against the scale humanity. This, in Agoravox of March 18, 2011, under the titraille "Libya-UN: lies media-Sarkozyist" Alain brings Jules to ask this question: "Why the peaceful revolts were suppressed in the blood Yemen and Bahrain do not we see the UN resolution? Find the error! . That also tell Allain Jules, in an article tellingly entitled "Libya: welcome to a wasp's nest," published in Le Point, 19 March, this: "Once Gadhafi swept (Inshallah!), How to be governed Libya? .... The danger is that Libya into a new Somalia ... The military expeditions always start well, shrinking violet. The result is more complicated to manage. " As for the Egyptian filmmaker Mogniss H. Abdullah, there will not mince words to stand out from the adventure being implemented: "Some countries like the United Arab Emirates United participating openly in the military-police occupation of Bahrain have volunteered for international intervention in Libya. Thus, regimes directly involved in the crackdown in an Arab country, claim to act against repression and massacres in another Arab country?What hypocrisy! The solidarity activists can not endorse any reason this duplicity which threatens the future of democratic revolutions in progress throughout the Arab-Berber and African ... Do not be afraid of the adversarial battle between us, including our Libyan comrades. No unit minimum. Do not be complicit in the balkanization of Libya and the countries of the region "(in Google Website). The irony, the bitter disappointment in all this is that African voices are not the most likely to lead this chorus of disapproval and Reserve because it is unfortunately to regret it afterwards because, as Thomas Carlyle wrote, "Our generation will have to repent of the wicked less harm than the silence of good people. " sanfinna.com